Robert Carson v. City of Fresno, et al
Filing
49
AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER TO FILE MOTION ON SHORTENED TIME - Plaintiff's Motion Hearing is set for 5/14/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck; a copy of the order and the moving papers are to be filed a nd served by ECF on all parties or counsel, on or before 4/26/2010; Any opposition to the motion is to be filed and served by ECF on all counsel or parties, on or before 5/7/2010; Reply papers, if any, are to be filed and served by ECF on all counsel or parties on or before 5/10/2010. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/23/2010. (Hernandez, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Thornton Davidson #166487 DAVIDSON & HAWKINS Attorneys at Law 2055 San Joaquin Street Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 256-9800 Facsimile: (559) 256-9791 Attorney for Plaintiff, ROBERT CARSON Rosemary McGuire, # 172549 Weakley Arendt & McGuire LLP 1630 E Shaw Ave #176 Fresno, CA 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262 Attorney for Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO, DAVE UNRUH, and JOHN OVERSTREET
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION ***** ROBERT CARSON Plaintiffs, vs. THE CITY OF FRESNO, officer DAVE UNRUH, an individual, officer JOHN OVERSTREET, an individual, and DOES 1-40, inclusive. Defendants. CASE No.: 1:08-cv-468 AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE MOTION ON SHORTENED TIME
_______________________________/ // //
1
____________________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By:
The parties, through their counsels of record, hereby stipulate to the entry of an order allowing Plaintiff to file his MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS on shortened time. Good cause exists on the grounds that trial is set for June 15, 2010, with a pre-trial conference set for May 6, 2010, and both parties agree that the motion should be filed prior to the Pre-Trial Conference. The parties respectfully request that the Court set the following briefing and hearing schedule: a. The motion is to be heard on May 14, 2010, in Courtroom 9, at 9:00 a.m.,
before the Honorable Judge Beck. b. A copy of the order and the moving papers are to be filed and served by
ECF on all parties or counsel, on or before April 26, 2010. c. Any opposition to the motion is to be filed and served by ECF on all
counsel or parties, on or before May 7, 2010. d. Reply papers, if any, are to be filed and served by ECF on all counsel or
parties, on or before May 10, 2010. Dated on April 22, 2010 in Fresno, California. THORNTON DAVIDSON & ASSOCIATES /S/ Thornton Davidson . THORNTON DAVIDSON Attorneys for Plaintiff, RT CARSON
ROBE
Dated on April 22, 2010, in Fresno, California. Fresno City Attorneys Office /S/ Rosemary McGuire d ROSEMARY MCGUIRE for Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO, DAVE UNRUH, and OVERSTREET
By: Attorney THE JOHN
2
____________________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 23 April 2010 IT IS SO ORDERED. a.
ORDER Good cause having been shown, the Court enters the follow order: Plaintiff's motion is to be heard on May 14, 2010, in Courtroom 9, at 9:00
a.m., before the Honorable Judge Beck. b. A copy of the order and the moving papers are to be filed and served by
ECF on all parties or counsel, on or before April 26, 2010. c. Any opposition to the motion is to be filed and served by ECF on all
counsel or parties, on or before May 7, 2010. d. Reply papers, if any, are to be filed and served by ECF on all counsel or
parties, on or before May 10, 2010.
/s/ Dennis L. Beck HON. JUDGE DENNIS L. BECK
3
____________________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?