Burch v. Hartley, et al.
Filing
50
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT Daniel Young Shin, With Prejudice, Pursuant to 48 Stipulation of Dismissal; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 25 Defendant Daniel Young Shin's Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/28/2009. (Jessen, A)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Christopher H. Burch, a state prisoner. The action is proceeding against Defendants Greenman, Ritter, Hawthorne, Choo, Cohen, Silveanu, Lyle, Harman, Hunt, Salmi, Kahng, Castillo, and Shin for violation of the Eighth Amendment and negligence. On September 24, 2009, the Court received the parties' stipulation to dismiss Defendant Daniel Young Shin, with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Accordingly, Defendant Daniel Young Shin is DISMISSED, with prejudice, and his motion to dismiss, filed August 18, 2009, is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE v. JAMES A. HARTLEY, et al., Defendants. CHRISTOPHER H. BURCH, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00508-OWW-GSA PC ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT DANIEL YOUNG SHIN, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO PARTIES' STIPULATION (Doc. 48) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT DANIEL YOUNG SHIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT (Doc. 25)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?