Fearence v. Schulteis et al

Filing 69

ORDER Denying Motion For Extension Of Discovery Deadline And Request For Subpoena Form, Without Prejudice (Doc. 66 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/30/2014. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACQUES FEARENCE, 12 13 1:08-cv-00615-LJO-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA FORM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 45.) vs. 14 L. L. SCHULTEIS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Jacques Fearence (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff on November 22, 2013, against defendants Hopkins, Davis, Duffy, 21 and Beckett for failure to protect Plaintiff, and against defendants Hopkins, Busby, Davis, 22 Duffy, and Beckett for conspiracy to use excessive force. 1 (Doc. 64.) This case now proceeds on the Third Amended 23 On December 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of the discovery deadline 24 and requested a subpoena form. (Doc. 66.) In light of the fact that discovery was stayed in this 25 action on January 17, 2014, pending the filing of Defendants’ answer, Plaintiff’s motion shall 26 be denied, without prejudice to renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. 27 1 28 On January 24, 2014, the court dismissed all remaining claims and defendants from this action, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. (Doc. 67.) 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion filed on December 19, 1 2 3 2013, is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4 January 30, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 D C_Si gnat ur e- EN : EA D 6i0kij8d 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?