Crayton v. Hedgpeth et al
Filing
257
ORDER Re Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J Vadas on 10/28/2013. (Masterson, G)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
TIMOTHY CRAYTON,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
v.
No. C 08-00621 WHA (NJV) (PR)
ORDER RE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN
PRO SE PRISONER EARLY
SETTLEMENT PROGRAM
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A.
HEDGPETH, et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
16
A settlement conference is scheduled in this case for 9:00 a.m. on November 20, 2013, at
17
Solano State Prison. Defense Counsel has informed the court that this case is being handled through
18
its pilot program with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Accordingly,
19
CDCR Counsel for is excused from attendance at the settlement conference.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: October 28, 2013
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TIMOTHY CRAYTON,
No. C 08-00621 WHA (NJV) (PR)
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
12
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
13
14
15
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A.
HEDGPETH, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
16
17
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on October 28 2013, I SERVED a true and correct
18
copy of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)
19
listed below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.
20
21
22
23
Timothy Crayton
P-07736
SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON (1050)
PO BOX 1050
SOLEDAD, CA 93960-1050
24
25
____________________________________
Linn Van Meter
Administrative Law Clerk to
the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?