Crayton v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 257

ORDER Re Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J Vadas on 10/28/2013. (Masterson, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 TIMOTHY CRAYTON, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, v. No. C 08-00621 WHA (NJV) (PR) ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROGRAM CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. HEDGPETH, et al., 13 14 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 15 16 A settlement conference is scheduled in this case for 9:00 a.m. on November 20, 2013, at 17 Solano State Prison. Defense Counsel has informed the court that this case is being handled through 18 its pilot program with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Accordingly, 19 CDCR Counsel for is excused from attendance at the settlement conference. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: October 28, 2013 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TIMOTHY CRAYTON, No. C 08-00621 WHA (NJV) (PR) 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 13 14 15 CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. HEDGPETH, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ 16 17 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on October 28 2013, I SERVED a true and correct 18 copy of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) 19 listed below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 20 21 22 23 Timothy Crayton P-07736 SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON (1050) PO BOX 1050 SOLEDAD, CA 93960-1050 24 25 ____________________________________ Linn Van Meter Administrative Law Clerk to the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?