Crayton v. Hedgpeth et al
Filing
262
ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL signed by District Judge William Haskell Alsup on 12/10/2013. Attorney Jeffrey L. Bornstein and Claudia A. Quiroz for Timothy Crayton added. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
TIMOTHY CRAYTON,
For the Eastern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 08-00621 WHA (PR)
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO
COUNSEL
13
v.
14
15
16
A. HEDGPETH, K. HARRINGTON,
and L. WOOD,
Defendants.
/
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42
19
U.S.C. § 1983. On August 22, 2013, the court denied defendants’ motion for summary
20
judgment. After settlement proceedings proved unsuccessful, the court set this matter for trial,
21
and referred the action to the Federal Pro Bono Program to locate counsel.
22
The Eastern District’s Pro Bono Program has informed the court that Jeffrey L.
23
Bornstein and Claudia A. Quiroz of K&L Gates LLP, 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200, San
24
Francisco, California 94111, have agreed to serve as appointed pro bono counsel for plaintiff.
25
Thus, Jeffrey L. Bornstein and Claudia A. Quiroz are hereby APPOINTED as counsel for
26
plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and the court’s Federal Pro Bono Project
27
guidelines. The scope of this referral shall be for all purposes for the duration of the case.
28
The parties are reminded that this matter is set for a final pre-trial conference on January
1
22, 2014, with trial set to being on January 27, 2014. Any motion to continue trial must be
2
made by December 13, 2013.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December
10
, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
C:\Users\tolandd\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\CRAYTON621apptcounsel.wpd
9
11
For the Eastern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?