Crayton v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 262

ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL signed by District Judge William Haskell Alsup on 12/10/2013. Attorney Jeffrey L. Bornstein and Claudia A. Quiroz for Timothy Crayton added. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 TIMOTHY CRAYTON, For the Eastern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 08-00621 WHA (PR) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL 13 v. 14 15 16 A. HEDGPETH, K. HARRINGTON, and L. WOOD, Defendants. / 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 22, 2013, the court denied defendants’ motion for summary 20 judgment. After settlement proceedings proved unsuccessful, the court set this matter for trial, 21 and referred the action to the Federal Pro Bono Program to locate counsel. 22 The Eastern District’s Pro Bono Program has informed the court that Jeffrey L. 23 Bornstein and Claudia A. Quiroz of K&L Gates LLP, 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200, San 24 Francisco, California 94111, have agreed to serve as appointed pro bono counsel for plaintiff. 25 Thus, Jeffrey L. Bornstein and Claudia A. Quiroz are hereby APPOINTED as counsel for 26 plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and the court’s Federal Pro Bono Project 27 guidelines. The scope of this referral shall be for all purposes for the duration of the case. 28 The parties are reminded that this matter is set for a final pre-trial conference on January 1 22, 2014, with trial set to being on January 27, 2014. Any motion to continue trial must be 2 made by December 13, 2013. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 10 , 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 C:\Users\tolandd\AppData\Local\Temp\notes1A03DD\CRAYTON621apptcounsel.wpd 9 11 For the Eastern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?