Crayton v. Hedgpeth et al
Filing
281
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge William Haskell Alsup on 1/14/2014. (Filing Deadline set for 1/27/2014 to file final settlement papers with the Court).(Lundstrom, T)
Case 1:08-cv-00621-WHA Document 280 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jeffrey L. Bornstein – 99358
jeff.bornstein@klgates.com
Claudia A. Quiroz – 254419
claudia.quiroz@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: +1 415 882 8200
Facsimile: +1 415 882 8220
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY CRAYTON
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TIMOTHY CRAYTON
11
12
13
14
Mr. Crayton,
Case No.
C 08-00621 WHA (NJV) (PR)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING UPCOMING DATES
vs.
A. HEDGPETH; K. HARRINGTON; and L.
WOOD
Judge:
Hon. William H. Alsup
Courtroom: 8
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING UPCOMING DATES; C 08-00621
WHA (NJV)
SF-299374 v1
Case 1:08-cv-00621-WHA Document 280 Filed 01/13/14 Page 2 of 3
On December 27, 2013, the parties attended a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge
1
2
Vadas and agreed to a settlement of this case. At that time, Plaintiff Timothy Crayton (“Mr.
3
Crayton”) was informed that CDCR normally takes approximately 180 days from the time final
4
settlement papers are signed before settlement funds are dispersed. For this reason, the parties asked
5
this Court to vacate all hearing dates and to hold the case in abeyance until the settlement funds were
6
paid.
Defendants prepared Settlement and Release papers that were received and approved by Mr.
7
8
Crayton’s counsel and sent to Mr. Crayton. Mr. Crayton has advised that he is concerned that the
9
Release papers could be interpreted to cover additional actions other than those in his First Amended
10
Complaint. He asked that we clarify the settlement papers to make it clear that he is dismissing with
11
prejudice his First Amended Complaint, including the RICO Counts, but that his release does not
12
cover or extend to other pending (and contemplated litigation) to include efforts he is making to
13
overturn his underlying conviction through a Habeas Petition or to enforce other judgments he has
14
obtained from other courts. He also continues to seek access to an ADA typewriter for his legal
15
efforts.
16
The parties have amended the “Recitals” paragraph to make it clear that the release in this
17
case that “. . . This Agreement covers all of the claims and allegations in the Complaint against
18
Defendants and any past or current employees of CDCR based on the allegations in the Complaint. It
19
does not cover other pending litigation, including but not limited to, Plaintiff’s Habeas Petition.”
20
21
22
Therefore, for good cause shown, the parties request that the Court give us until January 27,
2014 to file final settlement papers with the Court.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
Respectfully submitted,
24
K&L GATES LLP
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 13, 2013
By:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein
Jeffrey L. Bornstein
Claudia A. Quiroz
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY CRAYTON
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING UPCOMING DATES; C 08-00621
WHA (NJV)
Case 1:08-cv-00621-WHA Document 280 Filed 01/13/14 Page 3 of 3
1
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
Dated: January 13, 2013
By:
4
5
6
/s/ Elliott T. Seals
Elliott T. Seals
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
A. HEDGPETH, K. HARRINGTON, and
L. WOOD
7
ECF ATTESTATION
8
9
10
11
I, Jeffrey L. Bornstein, attest that concurrence in e-filing this STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING UPCOMING DATES has been obtained from signatory Elliott
T. Seals, in compliance with General Order 45, X.B.
12
13
Dated: January 13, 2010
By:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Bornstein
Jeffrey L. Bornstein
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
R NIA
p
am Alsu
illi
Judge W
ER
H
24
RT
23
D
PROVE
A William H. Alsup
HonorableP
United States District Court Judge
NO
22
By:
FO
21
14
Dated: January ___, 2014
LI
20
RT
U
O
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
18
that the parties shall have until January 27, 2014 to file final settlement papers with the Court.
S
17
Based on the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
UNIT
ED
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING UPCOMING DATES; C 08-00621
WHA (NJV)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?