(PC) Johnson v. Dovey et al

Filing 68

ORDER adopting 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 41 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/9/2010. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dated: b9ed48 Plaintiff Garrison S. Johnson ("plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants A. Dunnahoe, V. Ybarra, G. Ybarra, S. Cunningham, Powell, Curliss, Velasquez, Medrano, Holguin, and J. Gonzalez. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 14, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Neither party filed an Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 14, 2010, is adopted in full; and Defendants' motion to dismiss, filed November 6, 2009, is DENIED. v. DOVEY, et al., Defendants. / GARRISON S. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00640-LJO-DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs. 41, 58) IT IS SO ORDERED. June 9, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?