Howard v. Adams et al

Filing 17

ORDER DENYING 9 Motion for Default Judgment 12 Motion to Amend the Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 1/13/2009. (Figueroa, O)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff has filed a motion for default judgment and a motion to amend the complaint. There has been no service of process, and no returns of service have been filed with the court. Plaintiff's motion for the entry of default is therefore denied. Subsequent to Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, he filed a first amended complaint. Along with this order, an order is entered, dismissing the first amended complaint and granting Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. The motion for leave to amend the complaint is therefore moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions for the entry of default and for leave to file an amended complaint are denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 13, 2009 mmkd34 /s/ William M. Wunderlich UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DERRAL ADAMS, et al., Defendants. vs. STEVEN HOWARD, Plaintiff, 1: 08 CV 0659 OWW WMW PC ORDER RE MOTIONS (DOC 9, 12) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA