Rose v. State of California

Filing 27

ORDER Denying 24 Motion for Proof of Service, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/29/2010. (Verduzco, M)

(PC) Rose v. State of California

Doc. 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
In the future, Plaintiff should refrain from filing motions regarding the status of his case. Due to the large number of civil actions pending before the Court, the Court is unable to respond to individual inquiries regarding the s ta tu s of each case. The Court will, on its own, notify Plaintiff of all actions that are taken in his case.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN W. ROSE, Plaintiff, vs.

Case No. 1:08-cv-00681 LJO JLT (PC) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROOF OF SERVICE (Doc. 24)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. ________________________________/ Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's July 19, 2010 motion requesting the Court advise him of the status of his case. Plaintiff is directed to the Court's order and findings and recommendations filed recently on October 27, 2010. Therein, the Court explains the current status of the case, and instructs Plaintiff on how he should proceed moving forward. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's July 19, 2010 motion for proof of service (Doc. 24) is denied as having been rendered moot.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 29, 2010 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com