Thomas v. Garcia et al

Filing 229

ORDER Disregarding Key's Second Request for Relief 228 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/14/13. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEAN-PIERRE K. THOMAS, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. M.P. GARCIA, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:08-cv-0689 – JLT (PC) ORDER DISREGARDING KEY’S SECOND REQUEST FOR RELIEF (Doc. 228) 16 17 A jury trial was held in this matter between July 23 and July 25, 2013, in the U.S. District 18 Court in Bakersfield, CA. Inmate Michael Key, Jr., appeared and testified on Plaintiff’s behalf on July 19 23, 2013, pursuant to the Court’s Order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. (Docs. 166 and 20 213). Presently, Key requests that the Court “order [Corcoran State Prison] to immediately return 21 [him] to [California State Prison]-Sacramento.” (Doc. 228 at 2). 22 On August 6, 2013, the Court denied Plaintiff’s prior request for the Court to order Plaintiff’s 23 return to CSP-Sacramento. (Doc. 227 at 2). The Court reiterates that while the Court does not 24 condone retaliation against a witness, the Court lacks any jurisdiction to address the relief requested. 25 Furthermore, the Court lacks any authority to require the CDCR to take any particular action. The 26 court cannot require the CDCR to place Mr. Key in any particular prison, any particular housing unit 27 at the prison or to require the CDCR to place him in any particular job. 28 1 1 2 Accordingly, Key’s second request for relief (Doc. 228) is DENIED. The Court will STRIKE any subsequent filings submitted by Keys in this matter. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 14, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?