Thomas v. Garcia et al
Filing
68
ORDER Disregarding Motion for Extension of time to Discovery Cut-Off Date and Dispositive Motion Deadline 62 ; ORDER Disregarding Motion Regarding Status of Service 63 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/13/11. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JEAN-PIERRE K. THOMAS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
1:08-CV-00689 OWW DLB (PC)
ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCOVERY
CUT-OFF DATE AND DISPOSITIVE
MOTION DEADLINE (DOC. 62)
12
GARCIA, et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION
REGARDING STATUS OF SERVICE
(DOC. 63)
15
Plaintiff Jean-Pierre K. Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil
16
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 31, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to
17
extend time for discovery, and to file dispositive motions. Doc. 62. This motion is a duplicate of
18
Plaintiff’s March 9, 2010 motion. Pl.’s Mot., Doc. 32. The Court had previously addressed the
19
March 9, 2010 motion on August 3, 2010. Doc. 41. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED
20
that Plaintiff’s motion, filed January 31, 2011, is disregarded.
21
Plaintiff also filed a motion regarding service of process on Defendant Garcia on April
22
13, 2011. Doc. 63. As Defendant Garcia has filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint on May 3,
23
2011, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion, filed April 13, 2011, is disregarded.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
77e0d6
26
27
28
May 13, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?