City of Merced Redevelopment Agency v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
Filing
132
STIPULATION And ORDER Extending Deadlines For Filing Of Cost Bills And Objections, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/10/2015.(Opposition Deadline: 4/8/2015, Response due by 4/29/2015) (Fahrney, E)
1 Duane C. Miller, #57812
2
3
4
5
6
Michael D. Axline, #229840
Tracey L. O’Reilly, #206230
Molly McGinley Han, #293211
MILLER & AXLINE
A Professional Corporation
1050 Fulton Avenue, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95825-4225
Telephone: (916) 488-6688
Facsimile: (916) 488-4288
(Exempt from filing fees
per Govt. Code, § 6103)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 City of Merced Redevelopment Agency
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
CITY OF MERCED
12 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et. al.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION;
EXXON CORPORATION;
16 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.;
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY,
17 F/K/A PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND
18 AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST BY
MERGER TO TOSCO
19 CORPORATION; SHELL OIL
COMPANY; KINDER MORGAN
20 ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.;
EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC;
21 SFPP, L.P.; TESORO
CORPORATION; TESORO
22 REFINING AND MARKETING
COMPANY and DOES 1 THROUGH
23 200, inclusive,
24
Case No. 1:08-cv-00714-LJO-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR
FILING OF COST BILLS AND
OBJECTIONS
Complaint Filed: April 7, 2008
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS
1
Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation (formerly known
2 as Exxon Corporation), Shell Oil Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Tesoro
3 Corporation, and Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (collectively,
4 “Defendants”) and plaintiff Merced Designated Local Authority, as successor
5 agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Merced (“Plaintiff”) submit the
6 following stipulation:
7
8
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2015, the Court granted in part Defendants’
9 motion for summary judgment (CM/ECF Document No. 118) and the Clerk entered
10 judgment in accordance therewith (CM/ECF Document No. 119).
11
12
WHEREAS, Defendants filed four cost bills on March 4, 2015, two of which
13 included substantial supporting documentation.
14
15
WHEREAS, Plaintiff anticipates that it will need more than the two weeks
16 previously agreed upon in the February 18, 2015, Stipulation and Order.
17
18
WHEREAS, the parties are actively engaged in discussions that, if successful,
19 would resolve all cost bills and appeals, and that these discussions will require
20 approval of the parties’ respective clients and oversight boards.
21
22
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate Plaintiff will have up to, and including,
23 Wednesday, April 8, 2015, to file its opposition to any cost bills, and defendants will
24 have up to, and including, April 29, 2015, to file any responses to Plaintiff’s
25 objections.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS
-1-
1
2
3
Dated: March 10, 2015
4
Respectfully submitted,
MILLER & AXLINE
5
By
6
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
KING & SPALDING LLP
/s/ Michael D. Axline
MICHAEL D. AXLINE
By
MERCED DESIGNATED LOCAL
AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF MERCED
/s/ Charles C. Correll, Jr.
CHARLES C. CORRELL, JR.
Attorneys for Defendant
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
By
By
/s/ Jeffrey J. Parker
JEFFREY J. PARKER
Attorneys for Defendant
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
15
/s/ Colleen P. Doyle
COLLEEN P. DOYLE
Attorney for Defendants
TESORO CORPORATION AND
TESORO REFINING AND
MARKETING COMPANY
16
SEDGWICK LLP
17
By
18
19
20
/s/ Peter C. Condron
PETER C. CONDRON
Attorney for Defendants
SHELL OIL COMPANY AND
EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
21
22 IT IS SO ORDERED:
23
24 Dated: March 10, 2015
25
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?