City of Merced Redevelopment Agency v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
Filing
134
STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Deadlines for Filing Cost Bills and Objections, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/3/2015. (Kusamura, W)
1 Duane C. Miller, #57812
2
3
4
5
Michael D. Axline, #229840
Tracey L. O’Reilly, #206230
Molly McGinley Han, #293211
MILLER & AXLINE
A Professional Corporation
1050 Fulton Avenue, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95825-4225
Telephone: (916) 488-6688
Facsimile: (916) 488-4288
(Exempt from filing fees
per Govt. Code, § 6103)
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 City of Merced Redevelopment Agency
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
CITY OF MERCED
12 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et. al.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION;
EXXON CORPORATION;
16 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.;
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY,
17 F/K/A PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND
18 AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST BY
MERGER TO TOSCO
19 CORPORATION; SHELL OIL
COMPANY; KINDER MORGAN
20 ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.;
EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC;
21 SFPP, L.P.; TESORO
CORPORATION; TESORO
22 REFINING AND MARKETING
COMPANY and DOES 1 THROUGH
23 200, inclusive,
24
Case No. 1:08-cv-00714-LJO-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR
FILING OF COST BILLS AND
OBJECTIONS
Complaint Filed: April 7, 2008
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS
1
Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation (formerly known
2 as Exxon Corporation), Shell Oil Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Tesoro
3 Corporation, and Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (collectively,
4 “Defendants”) and plaintiff Merced Designated Local Authority, as successor
5 agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Merced (“Plaintiff”) submit the
6 following stipulation:
7
8
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2015, the Court granted in part Defendants’
9 motion for summary judgment (CM/ECF Document No. 118) and the Clerk entered
10 judgment in accordance therewith (CM/ECF Document No. 119).
11
12
WHEREAS, Defendants filed four cost bills on March 4, 2015, two of which
13 included substantial supporting documentation.
14
15
WHEREAS, Plaintiff anticipates that it will need more time to respond than
16 previously agreed upon in the March 10, 2015, Stipulation and Order.
17
18
WHEREAS, the parties are still actively engaged in discussions that, if
19 successful, would resolve all cost bills and appeals, and that these discussions will
20 require approval of the parties’ respective clients and oversight boards.
21 //
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS
-1-
1
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate Plaintiff will have up to, and including,
2 Wednesday, April 29, 2015, to file its opposition to any cost bills, and defendants
3 will have up to, and including, May 20, 2015, to file any responses to Plaintiff’s
4 objections.
5
6
Dated: April 2, 2015
7
Respectfully submitted,
MILLER & AXLINE
8
By
9
Attorney for Plaintiff
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
KING & SPALDING LLP
/s/ Michael D. Axline
MICHAEL D. AXLINE
By
MERCED DESIGNATED LOCAL
AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF MERCED
/s/ Jeremiah J. Anderson
Jeremiah J. Anderson
Attorneys for Defendant
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
By
By
/s/ Whitney Jones Roy
WHITNEY JONES ROY
Attorneys for Defendant
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
17
18
/s/ Colleen P. Doyle
COLLEEN P. DOYLE
Attorney for Defendants
TESORO CORPORATION AND
TESORO REFINING AND
MARKETING COMPANY
19
SEDGWICK LLP
20
By
21
22
/s/ Peter C. Condron
PETER C. CONDRON
Attorney for Defendants
SHELL OIL COMPANY AND
EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
April 3, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?