City of Merced Redevelopment Agency v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al

Filing 134

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Deadlines for Filing Cost Bills and Objections, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/3/2015. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 Duane C. Miller, #57812 2 3 4 5 Michael D. Axline, #229840 Tracey L. O’Reilly, #206230 Molly McGinley Han, #293211 MILLER & AXLINE A Professional Corporation 1050 Fulton Avenue, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825-4225 Telephone: (916) 488-6688 Facsimile: (916) 488-4288 (Exempt from filing fees per Govt. Code, § 6103) 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 City of Merced Redevelopment Agency 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 CITY OF MERCED 12 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et. al., Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; EXXON CORPORATION; 16 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.; CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, 17 F/K/A PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND 18 AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST BY MERGER TO TOSCO 19 CORPORATION; SHELL OIL COMPANY; KINDER MORGAN 20 ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.; EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC; 21 SFPP, L.P.; TESORO CORPORATION; TESORO 22 REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY and DOES 1 THROUGH 23 200, inclusive, 24 Case No. 1:08-cv-00714-LJO-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS Complaint Filed: April 7, 2008 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS 1 Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation (formerly known 2 as Exxon Corporation), Shell Oil Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, Tesoro 3 Corporation, and Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (collectively, 4 “Defendants”) and plaintiff Merced Designated Local Authority, as successor 5 agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Merced (“Plaintiff”) submit the 6 following stipulation: 7 8 WHEREAS, on February 4, 2015, the Court granted in part Defendants’ 9 motion for summary judgment (CM/ECF Document No. 118) and the Clerk entered 10 judgment in accordance therewith (CM/ECF Document No. 119). 11 12 WHEREAS, Defendants filed four cost bills on March 4, 2015, two of which 13 included substantial supporting documentation. 14 15 WHEREAS, Plaintiff anticipates that it will need more time to respond than 16 previously agreed upon in the March 10, 2015, Stipulation and Order. 17 18 WHEREAS, the parties are still actively engaged in discussions that, if 19 successful, would resolve all cost bills and appeals, and that these discussions will 20 require approval of the parties’ respective clients and oversight boards. 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS -1- 1 THEREFORE, the parties stipulate Plaintiff will have up to, and including, 2 Wednesday, April 29, 2015, to file its opposition to any cost bills, and defendants 3 will have up to, and including, May 20, 2015, to file any responses to Plaintiff’s 4 objections. 5 6 Dated: April 2, 2015 7 Respectfully submitted, MILLER & AXLINE 8 By 9 Attorney for Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 KING & SPALDING LLP /s/ Michael D. Axline MICHAEL D. AXLINE By MERCED DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MERCED /s/ Jeremiah J. Anderson Jeremiah J. Anderson Attorneys for Defendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP By By /s/ Whitney Jones Roy WHITNEY JONES ROY Attorneys for Defendant EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 17 18 /s/ Colleen P. Doyle COLLEEN P. DOYLE Attorney for Defendants TESORO CORPORATION AND TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY 19 SEDGWICK LLP 20 By 21 22 /s/ Peter C. Condron PETER C. CONDRON Attorney for Defendants SHELL OIL COMPANY AND EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill April 3, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR FILING OF COST BILLS AND OBJECTIONS -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?