Braley v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 38

ORDER, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 8/17/2009. It is ORDERED Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Court Ordered "Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment." (Doc. 37 ) (Scrivner, E)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// Plaintiff has filed a Petition/Request (Motion) for Court Ordered "Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment" (Doc. # 37) in this closed case, alleging that it was "error" for the District Court not to docket two pleadings that related to his Ninth Circuit appeal and requesting that these documents be docketed "nunc pro tunc." Pleadings relating to appeals in the Ninth Circuit are not docketed in the District Court as a matter of course and therefore the District Court did not err by not docketing them. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion for Court Ordered "Nunc Pro Tunc ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) California Department of Corrections and) ) Rehabilitation, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Thomas Braley, No. CV 1-08-0758-PHX-MHM ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Amendment." (Doc. # 37) DATED this 17th day of August, 2009.

-2-