Munoz, et al. vs. PHH Mortgage Corp., et al.
Filing
356
ORDER Approving the Filing of Redacted Briefs and Place Holder Exhibits (Doc. 349 ), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/4/2016. (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
EFRAIN MUNOZ, et al., individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
13
ORDER APPROVING THE FILING OF
REDACTED BRIEFS AND PLACE HOLDER
EXHIBITS
v.
14
15
No. 1:08-cv-00759-DAD-BAM
PHH CORP., et. al.,
(Doc. No. 349)
Defendants.
16
17
Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ unopposed administrative motion for leave to
18
19
temporarily file under seal confidential exhibits in support of plaintiffs’ (1) opposition to
20
defendants’ motion for summary judgment; (2) opposition to defendants’ motion to decertify
21
class; and (3) motion to exclude defendants’ expert, and given the current filing deadlines which
22
preclude full resolution of third-party confidentiality issues prior to filing, and for good cause
23
shown, the court hereby orders:
24
1) The parties shall file all briefs and supporting statements of fact due to be filed October 4,
25
2016 on the docket redacting all references to information that a third–party provided
26
pursuant to one or more of the confidentiality agreements and orders in this case and
27
related actions, for which such third-party may have potential confidentiality issues.
28
/////
1
1
2) With regard to exhibits that contain information that may be considered confidential by a
2
third–party that provided the information pursuant to one or more of the confidentiality
3
agreements and orders in this case and related actions, the parties shall file placeholders in
4
lieu of the documents.
5
3) The parties shall serve full and unredacted copies of all briefs and exhibits upon each
6
7
other when the above filings are made.
4) Within seven (7) days of the date of this order, the parties shall file:
8
a. unredacted and complete copies of all briefs and exhibits for which all
9
confidentiality concerns have been resolved; and
10
b. to the extent that any confidentiality concerns remain, the parties shall file a
11
renewed motion to seal stating with particularity the basis for any request that the
12
record be sealed with regard to such information.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 4, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?