Munoz, et al. vs. PHH Mortgage Corp., et al.
Filing
358
ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Unopposed 357 Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Nunc Pro Tunc, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/6/2016. (Doc. No. 355 is deemed filed timely on October 4, 2016.) (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
EFRAIN MUNOZ, et al., individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
15
No. 1:08-cv-00759-DAD-BAM
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE OUT OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC
PHH CORP., et. al.,
(Doc. No. 357)
Defendants.
16
17
On October 5, 2016, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking leave to file out of time nunc pro
18
19
tunc. (Doc. No. 357.) Specifically, plaintiffs timely filed their opposition to defendants’ motion
20
for decertification (Doc. No. 353) and opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment
21
(Doc. No. 354) on October 4, 2016. However, plaintiffs filed the exhibits and supporting
22
statements of fact (Doc. No. 355) in connection with that opposition on October 5, 2016, several
23
hours after the filing deadline. It appears clear that plaintiff’s late filing was related to the court’s
24
very recent order (Doc. No. 356) approving the filing of redacted briefs and place holder exhibits
25
that had been discussed with the court the evening before. (See Doc. No. 357 at 2.) Plaintiffs
26
represent to the court that defendants have no objection to the relief requested in their motion.
27
(Id. at 3.)
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ unopposed administrative motion for leave
2
to file out of time nunc pro tunc, the court hereby grants the motion (Doc. No. 357) and orders
3
that Doc. No. 355 be deemed filed timely on October 4, 2016.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
October 6, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?