Munoz, et al. vs. PHH Mortgage Corp., et al.

Filing 514

ORDER respecting Objections to Expert Witness Qualifications signed by Judge M Miller Baker on 1/13/2022. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM ORDER RESPECTING OBJECTIONS TO EXPERT WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 15 The court has issued an order respecting trial witnesses (ECF 506) that, 16 at the parties’ request, sets a deadline of January 14, 2022, for the parties to 17 identify which individuals they plan to bring to the trial to testify live and a 18 deadline of January 24, 2022, for them to exchange deposition designations. 19 Neither that order, the final pretrial order (ECF 456), nor the amended pretrial 20 order (ECF 460) provides a deadline for parties to object to whether a proffered 21 witness is qualified as an expert to give opinion testimony under the require- 22 ments set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 702 or for the parties to raise what 23 is commonly referred to as a Daubert objection. 24 It is therefore ORDERED as follows: 25 1. For expert witnesses who will testify in person, a party wishing to 26 object to a proposed expert witness’s qualifications to give opinion testimony 27 at trial as an expert witness shall file a statement of the objections and the 1 reasons therefor no later than January 21, 2022. The party proffering the pro- 2 posed expert may file a response to the objection(s) no later than January 28, 3 2022. 4 2. For expert witnesses whose testimony will be presented via depo- 5 sition designations, the parties shall notify each other by January 18, 2022, of 6 any such witnesses and which phase(s) of the trial such witnesses shall testify 7 in. A party wishing to object to any such witness’s qualifications to give opinion 8 testimony at trial as an expert witness shall file a statement of the objections 9 and the reasons therefor no later than January 25, 2022. The party proffering 10 the proposed expert may file a response to the objection(s) no later than Feb- 11 ruary 1, 2022. 12 3. The provisions of this order will apply to Plaintiffs’ proposed expert 13 witness Robert Hoyt, who is the subject of a pending motion to strike (ECF 14 475), unless the court grants the motion to strike prior to January 21, 2022. 15 16 Dated: January 13, 2022 1 /s/ M. Miller Baker M. Miller Baker, Judge 1 Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?