Munoz, et al. vs. PHH Mortgage Corp., et al.

Filing 93

ORDER Regarding 67 Motion for Class Certification signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/15/2010. The court ORDERS that Plaintiffs motion for class certification is DENIED without prejudice. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
Munoz, et al. vs. PHH Mortgage Corp., et al. Doc. 93 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On February 1, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. This motion was originally set to be heard on May 10, 2010. The parties stipulated to continue the hearing numerous times. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation the motion is currently set to be heard on December 6, 2010. An administrative review of the docket in this action reveals that Plaintiffs' February 1, 2010 motion has been administratively termed as an outstanding motion. Pursuant to the EFRAIN MUNOZ, LEONA LOVETTE ) and STEPHANIE MELANI, individually ) and on behalf of all others similarly , ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) PHH CORP., PHH MORTGAGE ) CORP., PHH HOME LOANS, LLC, ) and ATRIUM INSURANCE CORP., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 1:08-CV-0759 AWI DLB ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (Document #67) Civil Justice Reform Act, this court is not to delay ruling on a pending motion for more than six months. Because the motion for class certification has been pending for over six months, the court finds that in the interests of efficient case management Plaintiffs' motion should be denied without prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, the court ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 September 15, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?