Jones v. City of Orange Cove
Filing
85
STIPULATION and ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/9/2012. (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Hilda Cantu Montoy, City Attorney (SBN 77485)
2125 Kern Street, Suite 308
Fresno, CA 93721
Tel: (559) 579-1924
Fax: (559) 579-1923
Email: hildac@montoylaw.com
Michael P. Slater, Assistant City Attorney (SBN 150583)
7522 N. Colonial Avenue, Suite 100
Fresno, CA 93711
Tel: (559) 451-6655
Fax: (559)
Email: mike@mpslaterlaw.com
Attorneys for Respondent,
CITY COUNCIL OF ORANGE COVE, CITY OF ORANGE COVE
H. Ty Kharazi, Esq.; SBN 187894
Yarra, Kharazi & Associates
1250 Fulton Mall
Fresno, CA 93721
Tel: (559) 441-1214
Fax: (559) 441-1215
13
Attorneys for Petitioner, SUE JONES
14
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
Case No. 1:08−CV−00775-DLB
SUE JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.,
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CITY OF ORANGE COVE and Does 1
through 25, inclusive,
22
23
Defendants.
24
25
Whereas, on May 2, 2008, Petitioner Sue Jones (“Petitioner”) filed in the Fresno County
26
Superior Court a Petition for Writ of Prohibition, challenging Respondent’s, the City Council of
27
Orange Cove (“Respondent”), May 9, 2007 decision regarding Petitioner’s the condition of
28
Petitioner’s real property located at 449 G Street, Unit No. 11, Orange Cove, California.
Whereas, the Petition was filed in conjunction with a Complaint for Temporary
-1-
1
Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction; Damages and Declaratory
2
Relief.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Whereas, on or about June 4, 2008, both the Petition and Complaint were removed to this
Court based upon federal question jurisdiction.
Whereas, on or about June 8, 2010, this Court heard and decided upon two Motions for
Summary Judgment in favor of Respondent.
Whereas, on or about July 7, 2010, Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal with the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeal, challenging this Court’s ruling on the Motions for Summary Judgment.
Whereas, on or about October 20, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a
10
decision directing the District Court to treat Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Prohibition as a
11
Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandamus pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure
12
1094.5.
13
14
15
16
17
Whereas, the parties agree that the Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandamus should
be tried prior to proceeding to trial on the Complaint.
Therefore, the parties to this matter, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to
the following schedule:
1.
Respondent, City of Orange Cove shall have sixty (60) days from the effective
18
date of this Order to provide Petitioner with an electronic copy of the Administrative Record for
19
review and comment.
20
2.
Petitioner shall have Thirty (30) days from Respondent’s delivery of the
21
Administrative Record to advise Respondent whether Petitioner has any objection to the form or
22
contents of the Administrative Record.
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.
Respondent shall certify and lodge the Administrative Record with this Court
within one hundred ten (110) days of the effective date of this Order.
4.
Petitioner shall file and serve on Respondent, its Opening Brief within sixty (60)
days of the date the Administrative Record is lodged with this Court.
5.
Respondent shall file and serve its Opposition Brief within (20) days of the date
Petitioner files and serves its Opening Brief.
-2-
1
2
6.
Respondent files and serves its Opposition Brief.
3
4
Petitioner shall file and serve any Reply Brief within ten (10) days of the date
7.
Upon receipt of Petitioner’s Reply Brief, the Court shall schedule a half day
bench trial on the Petition.
5
6
7
Dated:
Dec. 12, 2011
8
Law Office of Michael P. Slater
By
/s/
Michael P. Slater
Attorney for Respondent,
City of Orange Cove
9
10
11
12
Dated:
Dec. 12, 2011
Yarra, Kharazi & Associates
13
By
14
/s/
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
City of Sue Jones
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
January 9, 2012
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
DEAC_Signature-END:
3b142a
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?