Slama v. City of Madera, et al
Filing
173
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL; ORDER SETTING Motion Briefing Schedule re Defendants' Request to Call Plaintiff's Former Counsel as a Witness; ORDER SETTING Motion in Limine Schedule. Pretrial Conference s et for 8/1/2013, at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Motions in Limine Hearing set for 8/19/2013, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Jury Trial set for 9/3/2013, at 08: 30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The Court DENIED without prejudice Defendants' request to depose or call Geringer as a witness. If Defendants wish to renew their request to seek Geringer's testimony and deposition, the Court sets the following briefing schedule for this issue: Defendants' Opening Brief shall be filed by no later than June 19, 2013. Plaintiff's Opposition Brief shall be filed by no later than June 28, 2013. Defendants 039; Reply Brief shall be filed by no later than July 5, 2013. The motion will be deemed submitted at that time. No oral argument will be necessary unless requested by the Court. The Court ORDERS the parties' counsel to meet and confer on antici pated motions in limine and to distill evidentiary issues. The Court FURTHER ORDERS the parties to file motions in limine as to only important matters in that most evidentiary issues can be resolved easily with a conference among the Court and counse l. If, after conferencing, any party chooses to file motions in limine, the party shall file and serve its motions in limine by no later than August 5, 2013, oppositions to motions in limine shall be filed and served no later than August 12, 2013. The Court will not accept or consider reply papers. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/5/2013. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ANTHONY DEAN SLAMA,
7
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00810-SKO
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL
v.
ORDER SETTING MOTION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST
TO CALL PLAINTIFF'S FORMER
COUNSEL AS A WITNESS
9
CITY OF MADERA, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
ORDER SETTING MOTION IN LIMINE
SCHEDULE
12
/
13
14
On May 31, 2013, the Court conducted a Pretrial Conference. Plaintiff Anthony Dean Slama
15
("Plaintiff") appeared personally through his counsel, Andrew J. Fishkin, Esq. Defendants Officer
16
Sheklanian and Officer Chavez ("Defendants") appeared personally through their counsel, Gregory
17
L. Myers, Esq.
18
A.
New Dates Set
19
Plaintiff requested to continue the trial date, set to begin on July 1, 2013, and Defendants
20
agreed to the continuance. The Court ORDERED that the trial be continued and set the following
21
dates:
22
Pretrial Conference:
August 1, 2013, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7
23
Motions in Limine Hearing: August 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7
24
Trial:
September 3, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7
25
B.
Motion Briefing Schedule Re: Testimony of Plaintiff's Former Counsel
26
In the Amended Joint Pretrial Conference Statement (Doc. 170), the parties indicated that
27
Defendants intended to call Plaintiff's former counsel, Steven Geringer ("Geringer"), as a witness
28
1
at trial and asserted that it may be advisable to take Geringer's deposition. Defendants contended
2
that Plaintiff had waived his attorney-client privilege by providing information to the State Bar
3
during its investigation of an anonymous complaint filed against Geringer.
4
Plaintiff opposed Geringer's appearance, deposition, and testimony based on the
5
attorney-client privilege. Plaintiff asserted that providing information in response to an investigation
6
of an anonymous complaint did constitute a waiver of that privilege.
7
The Court DENIED without prejudice Defendants' request to depose or call Geringer as a
8
witness. Defendants may renew their request by filing a motion setting forth legal authority and
9
precedent that Plaintiff has waived the attorney-client privilege in this case by providing information
10
to the State Bar during its investigation into an anonymous complaint against Geringer. The parties
11
were informed that any brief submitted to the Court should provide Ninth Circuit and/or California
12
federal/state authority, or explain why such authority could not be cited.
13
14
If Defendants wish to renew their request to seek Geringer's testimony and deposition, the
Court sets the following briefing schedule for this issue:
15
Defendants' Opening Brief shall be filed by no later than June 19, 2013.
16
Plaintiff's Opposition Brief shall be filed by no later than June 28, 2013.
17
Defendants' Reply Brief shall be filed by no later than July 5, 2013.
18
The motion will be deemed submitted at that time. No oral argument will be necessary
19
unless requested by the Court.
20
C.
Motions in Limine
21
The Court ORDERS the parties' counsel to meet and confer on anticipated motions in limine
22
and to distill evidentiary issues. The Court FURTHER ORDERS the parties to file motions in limine
23
as to only important matters in that most evidentiary issues can be resolved easily with a conference
24
among the Court and counsel. If, after conferencing, any party chooses to file motions in limine, the
25
party shall file and serve its motions in limine by no later than August 5, 2013.1 Oppositions to
26
27
28
1
The Court notes that Defendants have filed a motion in limine. (Doc. 171.) As the Court is not considering
motions in limine at this time, Defendants may either file an new motion in limine or notice renewing the current motion
in limine by the new deadline of August 5, 2013.
2
1
motions in limine shall be filed and served no later than August 12, 2013. The Court will not
2
accept or consider reply papers. As noted above, the Court will conduct a motion in limine hearing
3
on August 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 (SKO).
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
cc0hp0
June 5, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?