Rodriguez v. County of Stanislaus, et al.

Filing 164

STIPULATION and ORDER of Dismissal as to Defendant City of Riverbank signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/12/2010. (Figueroa, O)

Rodriguez v. County of Stanislaus, et al.

Doc. 164

1 Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Esq. (State Bar No. 56693) Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq. (State Bar No. 220694) 2 CARCIONE, CATTERMOLE, DOLINSKI, OKIMOTO, STUCKY, UKSHINI, 3 MARKOWITZ & CARCIONE, L.L.P. A Professional Corporation 4 601 Brewster Avenue P.O. Box 3389 5 Redwood City, CA 94064 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs: LUCIO CORRAL RODRIGUEZ, individually, 8 and as Successor in Interest to the decedents, MARICRUZ CORRAL, IVAN ALEXANDER CORRAL, 9 and LUCIO ANTHONY CORRAL 10 Attorney for Defendant/Cross-Complainant, City of Riverbank 11 Cornelius J.Callahan, Esq. BORTON PETRINI, LLP 12 1104 12th Street Modesto, CA 95354 13 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 14 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANT: 15 CITY OF RIVERBANK 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 FRESNO DIVISION 19
LU C IO CORRAL RODRIGUEZ,

Case No.: 1:08-CV-00856-OWW-GSA

20 in d iv id u ally, and as Successor in Interest to
th e decedents, MARICRUZ CORRAL,

21 IV A N ALEXANDER CORRAL, and
LU C IO ANTHONY CORRAL,

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL [FRCP 41(a)(2)]

22
P l a i n t i ff,

23
vs.

24
C O U N T Y OF STANISLAUS, CITY OF

25 M O D E S T O , CITY OF RIVERBANK,
S T A T E OF CALIFORNIA, AMTRAK

26 C A LIF O R N IA , BURLINGTON
N O R T H E R N SANTA FE RAILWAY; and

27 D O E S 1 to 200, __________________________________/ 28 1.
179395 / mb STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Dockets.Justia.com

1

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff, LUCIO CORRAL

2 RODRIGUEZ, individually, and as Successor in Interest to the decedents, MARICRUZ 3 CORRAL, IVAN ALEXANDER CORRAL, and LUCIO ANTHONY CORRAL and 4 Defendant CITY OF RIVERBANK, through their respective undersigned counsel that the 5 above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant CITY OF RIVERBANK, 6 only. 7 It is further stipulated by said parties that Plaintiff bear his own costs and attorney's

8 fees incurred in this action and that Defendant CITY OF RIVERBANK bear its own costs and 9 attorney's fees incurred in this action. 10 11 Dated: July 8, 2010 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
D a te d : July 8, 2010

CA RCIO N E , CATTERMOLE, DOLINSKI, OKIMOTO, STUCKY, UKSHINI, MA RKO W IT Z & CARCIONE, LLP By: /s/ Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq. LUCIO CORRAL RODRIGUEZ, individually, and as Successor in Interest to the decedents, MARICRUZ CORRAL, IVAN ALEXANDER CORRAL, and LUCIO ANTHONY CORRAL

19 20
B y:

BORTON PETRINI, LLP /s/ Cornelius J. Callahan, Esq. Attorney for Defendant C IT Y OF RIVERBANK

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.
179395 / mb STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1 2

ORDER The Court having reviewed the Stipulation set forth above and finds it to be in order,

3 therefore, 4 /// 5 /// 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: July 12, 2010 15 emm0d6 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3.
179395 / mb STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

IT IS ORDERED that: 1. This action be and is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant CITY OF RIVERBANK, only. 2. PLAINTIFF and Defendant CITY OF RIVERBANK shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees incurred in this action.

/s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE