Rodriguez v. County of Stanislaus, et al.
Filing
541
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to dismiss action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/01/2012. Show Cause Response due by 3/9/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
LUCIO CORRAL RODRIGUEZ,
11
12
13
CASE NO. CV F 08-0856 LJO GSA
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO
DISMISS ACTION
(Doc. 539.)
vs.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION,
14
Defendant.
15
/
16
This Court’s January 30, 2012 order required the parties, no later than February 29, 2012, to file
17
appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action, or to show good cause why the action has not been
18
dismissed. The parties have failed to file papers to comply with the January 30, 2012 order. This
19
Court’s Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with an order of this Court “may be grounds
20
for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent
21
power of the Court.”
22
Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than March 9, 2012, to file papers to show
23
cause why sanctions, including dismissal of this action with or without prejudice and monetary sanctions
24
against counsel and/or the parties, should not be imposed for failure to comply with the January 30, 2012
25
order. This order to show cause will be discharged if, no later than March 9, 2012, papers are filed to
26
dismiss this action in its entirety.
27
Moreover, if the parties fail to complete settlement, this Court will explore resetting trial as soon
28
as possible and reassigning this action to another district judge, including one from the Sacramento
1
1
division or another district.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d
March 1, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?