Wilmshurst v. The City of Angels Camp et al

Filing 97

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/27/11 ADOPTING 95 Findings and Recommendations in Full. It is THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff, Richard E. Wilmshurst APPEAR on 10/20/2011 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4 (WBS) of the Robert E. Coyle U.S. Cour thouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA before Judge William B. Shubb and SHOW CAUSE why he should not be held in civil contempt for failure to comply with the 89 Order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to appear may result in his being adjudged in contempt. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 RICHARD E. WILMSHURST, 12 NO. CIV. 1:08-00858 WBS SMS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT 14 15 16 17 18 THE CITY OF ANGELS CAMP, CHRIS COMFORT, individually and as employee of the City of Angels Camp, and TONY TACHEIRA, individually and as the Chief of Police of the City of Angels Camp, 19 Defendants. / 20 21 ----oo0oo---- 22 After considering the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 23 Recommendations (Docket No. 95), plaintiff’s opposition thereto 24 (Docket No. 96), and the events leading to the Magistrate Judge’s 25 recommendation, the court hereby adopts the Findings and 26 Recommendations in full. 27 28 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff, Richard E. Wilmshurst, appear on October 20, 2011, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1 1 No. 4 of the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 2 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, and show cause why he should 3 not be held in civil contempt for failure to comply with the 4 court’s order that he appear for a deposition on July 8, 2011 5 (Docket No. 89). 6 the time and place designated in this Order may result in his 7 being adjudged in contempt. 8 DATED: Plaintiff is advised that failure to appear at September 27, 2011 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?