Phillip W. Dunn v. Cate et al
Filing
32
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 2/2/2010. Show Cause Response due by 2/19/2010 from Plaintiff. (Lundstrom, T)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. Matthew Cate, et al., Defendants. Phillip Dunn Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-08-0873-NVW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
By order of January 12, 2010, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss was granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. # 31.) Therefore, Defendants' time to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint expired on January 26, 2010. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). No answer has been filed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause by February 19, 2010, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution unless an application for entry of default or answer to the First Amended Complaint is filed before then. DATED this 2nd day of February, 2010.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
