Maria Lopez v. Wasco State Prison, et al.

Filing 62

ORDER Granting Defendants' 59 Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Dates signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/3/2009. Status Conference SET FOR 1/27/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Esteves, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 P.L. VASQUEZ, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On October 22, 2009, Defendants P.L. Vasquez, A. Kopp, and M. Tews filed a Motion to 19 Stay the dates outlined in the Amended Scheduling Order issued on March 12, 2009. (Doc. 39). 20 The basis of the request is that since the time the scheduling order was issued, Plaintiff filed a 21 Second Amended Complaint (SAC) naming additional defendants. In response, some of the 22 Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the SAC and the motion is still pending. 23 No opposition to the Motion to Stay has been filed. Upon review, the Court finds 24 Defendants have established good cause for the request and the motion is GRANTED. 25 Accordingly, the dates outlined in the Amended Scheduling Order referenced above are stayed 26 pending the resolution of the Motion to Dismiss. The Court sets this case for a status conference 27 on January 27, 2010 at 9:30 am. The parties shall file a joint status report five days prior to the 28 conference outlining the procedural posture of this case. The parties shall also notify the court if 1 / (Doc. 59) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY SCHEDULING ORDER DATES MARIA LOPEZ, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-889 AWI-BAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the Motion to Dismiss is resolved prior to the status conference so that the status conference date may be advanced. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: cf0di0 December 3, 2009 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?