Rivas et al v. California Franchise Tax Board et al

Filing 44

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 3, 2012. (Munoz, I)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

THOMAS KASCHAK,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. CV F 08-0942 LJO SKO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO
OBEY ORDER

vs.
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD, et al.,

13
Defendants.
14

/

15

This Court’s October 27, 2011 order required the parties to file a status report within 20 days.

16

The parties have failed to file a status report to comply with the October 27, 2011 order. This Court’s

17

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with an order of this Court “may be grounds for

18

imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent

19

power of the Court.”

20

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than February 10, 2012, to file papers to

21

show cause why sanctions, including dismissal of this action with or without prejudice and monetary

22

sanctions against counsel and/or the parties, should not be imposed for failure to comply with the

23

October 27, 2011 order. This order to show cause will be discharged if, no later than February 10, 2012,

24

papers are filed to dismiss this action in its entirety.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d

February 3, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1