Underwood v. Knowles et al
Filing
190
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Close Case and Adjust Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/15/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
VALENTINE E. UNDERWOOD,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
Case No. 1:08-cv-00986-BAM PC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET
TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
M. KNOWLES, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff Valentine E. Underwood (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
19 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties have consented
20 to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 4, 97).
21
On November 14, 2016, defense counsel filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with
22 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 189.) The
23 stipulation is signed by Plaintiff and defense counsel, indicating that the entire action has been
24 resolved, should be dismissed with prejudice, and each side shall bear their own costs. (ECF No.
25 189.)
26 ///
27 ///
28
1
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
This action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
3 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, and expenses of any type,
4 including attorney’s fees. There is no prevailing party in this action;
5
2.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcement of the
6 terms of the settlement agreement between the parties; and
7
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines,
8 and close this case.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
November 15, 2016
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?