Miles v. Martel

Filing 36

ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS re 34 signed by District Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/27/2012. CASE CLOSED. The Warden at the California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi, California, shall release Petitioner Tyrone Miles from state custody to Emily Galvin, counsel for Petitioner, as soon as possible, but no later than 48 hours from the entry of judgment. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 Tyrone Wayland MILES, 11 Case No. 1-8-cv-1002-JF Petitioner, 12 13 ------------------- ORDER GRANTING WRIT [PROPOSED] v. OF HABEAS CORPUS 14 Michael MARTEL, Acting Warden of Mule 15 Creek State Prison, 16 Respondent 17 18 19 Being in receipt of the Ninth Circuit’s November 21, 2012 order withdrawing its that a writ of habeas corpus be granted 20 -------------------------------------------------September 28, 2012 opinion and directing the granting of a writ of habeas corpus, and the parties 21 having no objection and stating no legal cause why such order should not issue, the Court hereby 22 ORDERS: 23 24 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED; 25 26 27 28 2. The Warden at the California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi, California, shall RELEASE petitioner TYRONE MILES from state 1 custody to Emily Galvin, counsel for Petitioner, as soon as possible, but 2 no later than 48 hours from the entry of judgment; 3 4 3. The Warden at the California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi, 5 California, shall be in compliance with this Order if Petitioner is 6 released on Thursday, November 29, 2012; and 7 8 4. The Clerk is directed forthwith to enter judgment pursuant to this order. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 November 27, 2012 DATED: _________________ ______________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?