Paramount Farms, Inc. vs. Ventilex B.V.

Filing 63

ORDER granting telephonic appearances of all counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/25/2010. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
Paramount Farms, Inc. vs. Ventilex B.V. Doc. 63 1 2 3 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ FRESNO DIVISION 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. It is the general practice of the Court to require the personal appearance of counsel at hearings regarding motions to compel further discovery. Requests for telephonic appearances made prior to the filing of the parties' Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement ("Joint Statement") are not generally granted. However, after reviewing the parties' Joint Statement filed in this matter on August 20, 2010, the scope of the dispute is such that telephonic appearances by counsel are appropriate. No personal appearances are required. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties may appear telephonically for the hearing set in this matter before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on August 27, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 of the above entitled court; and The parties should coordinate a conference call among all participants appearing telephonically and then contact the Court at (559) 499-5790 at the time designated for the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj August 25, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VENTILEX B.V., a business entity of form unknown; and DOES 1-20, inclusive Defendants. / v. PARAMOUNT FARMS, INC., Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01027-LJO-SKO ORDER GRANTING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES OF ALL COUNSEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?