Sweet v. Bridge Base,Inc., et al.

Filing 61

Joint Stipulation and ORDER Continuing Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/2/2009. Initial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to 6/17/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. (Esteves, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 Gregory S. Mason, # 148997 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP P.O. Box 28912 5 River Park Place East Fresno, CA 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 Samuel S. Cohen (pro hac vice application pending) Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP Two North LaSalle Street Suite 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60602-3801 Phone: (312) 269-8000 Fax: (312) 269-1747 Attorneys for Defendants BRIDGE BASE, INC., a Nevada corporation, BRIDGE BASE, INC., a Nevada corporation dba BRIDGE BASE ONLINE, BRIDGE BASE ONLINE LTD., a Nevada corporation (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYNDIA SWEET, an individual, Plaintiff, v. BRIDGE BASE, INC., a Nevada corporation, BRIDGE BASE, INC., a Nevada corporation dba BRIDGE BASE ONLINE, BRIDGE BASE ONLINE LTD., a Nevada corporation, FRED GITELMAN, an individual, SHERI WINESTOCK, an individual, and UDAY IVATURY, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 1:08-CV-01034-AWI-GSA JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER Date: April 15, 2009 Time: 9 a.m. Courtroom: 10 U. S. Magistrate Judge: Gary S. Austin The following Joint Stipulation is entered into between Plaintiff CYNDIA SWEET and Defendants BRIDGE BASE, INC., a Nevada corporation, BRIDGE BASE, INC., a Nevada corporation dba BRIDGE BASE ONLINE, BRIDGE BASE ONLINE LTD., a Nevada corporation. The parties to the above-entitled action by and through their respective counsel of 1:08-CV-01034-AWI-GSA JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 record hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. That the Scheduling Conference currently on calendar for April 15, 2009, be moved to June 17, 2009, at 9 a.m., in Courtroom 10. Accordingly, THE ABOVE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREBY STIPULATE AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST AN ORDER FROM THE COURT CONTINUING THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO JUNE 17, 2009, AND CONTINUING THE DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT TO A DATE THE COURT ORDERS. Dated: April 2, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF TED MANN DOZIER INTERNET LAW, P.C. By:/s/ Lewis T. Mann Lewis T. Mann Donald E. Morris Attorneys for Plaintiff CYNDIA SWEET Dated: April 2, 2009 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLP By:/s/ Gregory S. Mason Gregory S. Mason Samuel S. Cohen Attorneys for Defendants 2 1:08-CV-01034-AWI-GSA JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 ORDER Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and in the interests of justice and fairness and upon a showing of good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled for April 15, 2009, be continued to June 17, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. A Joint Scheduling Report shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF and e-mailed, in WordPerfect or Word Format, to gsaorders@caed.uscourts.gov one week prior to the conference. Dated: April 2, 2009 /s/ Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge 3 1:08-CV-01034-AWI-GSA JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?