Harrison v. Adams, et al
Filing
303
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/7/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL D. HARRISON,
Case No.: 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-MJS (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
D. ADAMS, et al.,
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
AD TESTIFICANDUM
Defendants.
/
Michael D. Harrison, CDCR # C-20896, a necessary and material witness in a settlement
conference in this case on July 6, 2016, is confined in Valley State Prison (VSP), in the custody
of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas
Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before
Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom #6, 2500 Tulare
Street, Fresno, California 93721, on Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,
commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a
settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement
conference or as ordered by the court.
2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is
ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
To: Warden, VSP, P.O. Box 99, Chowchilla, California 93610:
WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Thurston at
the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by the
court.
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate
and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 7, 2016
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?