Harrison v. Adams, et al
Filing
309
ORDER after Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 07/06/2016. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL HARRISON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
T. MOORE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:08-cv-01065 AWI MJS
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
On July 6, 2016, the Court held a settlement conference at which the parties were able to come
17
18
to a compromise of the matter. (Doc. 308) The key terms of the settlement were put on the record
19
and the parties executed the settlement documents at the conclusion of the conference.1 Mr. Harrison
20
agreed, and counsel concurred, that the stipulated dismissal could be filed before the defendants make
21
the payment—with the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. Thus,
22
pursuant to Local Rule 160, the Court ORDERS:
1.
23
Defendants’ counsel SHALL file the stipulated request for dismissal no later than July
8, 2016. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement;
24
25
///
26
///
27
1
28
Likewise, counsel for the CDCR agreed to assist Mr. Harrison is obtaining copies of the settlement agreement from his
case in the Southern District and/or being provided a copy of the settlement agreement for his signature by alerting the
assigned attorney for the defendants in that action of the request. Mr. Harrison reported that he sent the signed document
to his pro bono counsel, Leah Strickland, several weeks ago but believes that it has not been forwarded by “Litigation” at
his housing location due to the fact that Mr. Harrison did not have a stamped envelope in which to place the documents.
1
2.
All pending dates, conferences and hearings are VACATED and any pending motions
are ordered TERMINATED.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 7, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?