Gamez v. Gonzalez, et al.
Filing
100
ORDER granting 99 Motion for extension of time to file reply and continuing pretrial conference signed by District Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/14/2011. ( Filing Deadline: 8/1/2011. Pretrial Conference set for 9/12/2011 at 11:00 AM before District Judge M. James Lorenz). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SERGIO ALEJANDRO GAMEZ,
CDCR #C-47759,
Civil No.
Plaintiff,
15
16
ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF
AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; AND (2) CONTINUING
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
vs.
17
18
08-1113 MJL (PCL)
F. GONZALES, et al.,
19
[ECF No. 99]
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and
Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has filed a pleading [ECF No. 99]
in which he seeks an extension of time to file a Reply to Defendants’ Opposition [ECF Nos. 94,
95] to his Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff claims that he has yet to receive Defendants’
Opposition as of July 10, 2011 and his Reply was due to be filed on July 11, 2011. For good
cause shown, the Court will give Plaintiff an extension of time to file a Reply to Defendants’
Opposition.
-1-
08cv1113 MJL (PCL)
1
Plaintiff must file and serve his Reply no later than Monday, August 1, 2011. At that
2
time the Court will consider both Motions to be fully briefed and no oral argument is necessary.
3
In light of this extension of time, the final pretrial conference currently set on the Court’s
4
5
calendar for August 8, 2011 is continued to September 12, 2011 at 11:00 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
DATED: July 14, 2011
8
9
M. James Lorenz
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
08cv1113 MJL (PCL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?