Gamez v. Gonzalez, et al.
Filing
30
ORDER granting 27 Motion request for discovery conference signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Lewis on 5/18/2010. (Lundstrom, T)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 v. F. GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants. (Doc. No. 27) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SERGIO ALEJANDRO GÁMEZ, Case No. 08cv1113 MJL (PCL) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST Plaintiff, FOR DISCOVERY CONFERENCE
On April 29, 2010, Plaintiff Sergio Alejandro Gámez filed a Request for a Discovery
15 Conference in order to resolve outstanding discovery disputes.1/ (Doc. No. 27.) 16 The Court determines that this matter is currently set for a telephonic Mandatory
17 Settlement Conference on May 25, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. (See Doc. No. 22.) The Court sets this 18 date as the appropriate date to hear the parties' discovery disputes in addition to argument on 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Expert Witness (Doc. No. 26) and conducting the 20 Mandatory Settlement Conference. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED.
22 DATE: May 18, 2010 23 24 25 26 27 1. Plaintiff's motion states that the parties "have not been able to come to terms on 28 discoverable items." (Mot. at 1.) Plaintiff further requests "a telephonic meeting with Magistrate Judge Lewis in order to assist us to resolve the issues." (Id.) Therefore, although Plaintiff's Motion has been filed on the docket as "Motion Requesting Case Management Conference," the Court will address the motion as a Request for a Discovery Conference.
cc: The Honorable M. James Lorenz All Parties and Counsel of Record
Peter C. Lewis U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?