Wells v. County of Stanislaus, et al.

Filing 44

STIPULATION and ORDER to Dismiss Defendants, The City of Waterford, Rob Jackson and Charles Deschenes, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/11/09. The City of Waterford, Rob Jackson and Charles Deschenes terminated.(Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 John Burton, State Bar No. 86029 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON 2 414 South Marengo Avenue Pasadena, California 91101 3 Telephone: (626) 449-8300 4 Facsimile: (626) 449-4417 E-Mail: jb@johnburtonlaw.com 5 Peter M. Williamson, State Bar No. 97309 6 WILLIAMSON & KRAUSS 21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 305 7 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: (818) 226-5700 8 Facsimile: (818) 226-5704 E-Mail: pmw@williamson-krauss.com 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs James Albert Wells and 10 Judy Wells, and as the personal representatives of James Wells, deceased 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above entitled action, by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), the parties stipulate that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants City of Waterford, Rob Stipulation re: Dismissal of Parties & [Proposed] Order E.D. Cal. Case No. 1:08-CV-O1 l46-OWW-GSA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES ALBERT WELLS AND JUDY WELLS, Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-cv-1146 OWW GSA STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF WATERFORD, ROB JACKSON AND CHARLES DESCHENES; ORDER Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) -1- PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 Jackson and Charles Deschenes, only. 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: September 10, 2009 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DATED: September 10, 2009 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation re: Dismissal of Parties & [Proposed] Order E.D. Cal. Case No. 1:08-CV-O1 l46-OWW-GSA Each side shall bear its own costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. LAW OFFICES OF DAN FARRAR 4 DATED: September 10, 2009 By: /s/ DAN FARRAR DAN FARRAR Attorney for Defendants LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON By: /s/ JOHN BURTON JOHN BURTON Attorney for Plaintiffs James & Judy Wells WILLIAMSON & KRAUSS By: /s/ PETER M. WILLIAMSON PETER M. WILLIAMSON Attorney for Plaintiffs James & Judy Wells -2- PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 3 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: September 11, 2009 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Defendants City of Waterford, Rob Jackson and Charles Deschenes, only, are 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 4 dismissed from the instant action with prejudice. /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Stipulation re: Dismissal of Parties & [Proposed] Order E.D. Cal. Case No. 1:08-CV-O1 l46-OWW-GSA -3- PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?