Wells v. County of Stanislaus, et al.

Filing 56

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING Defendant Matthew Erickson with Prejudice signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/3/2010. Matthew Erickson terminated.(Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 John Burton, State Bar No. 86029 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON 2 414 South Marengo Avenue Pasadena, California 91101 3 Telephone: (626) 449-8300 4 Facsimile: (626) 449-4417 E-Mail: jb@johnburtonlaw.com 5 Peter M. Williamson, State Bar No. 97309 6 WILLIAMSON & KRAUSS 21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 305 7 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: (818) 226-5700 8 Facsimile: (818) 226-5704 E-Mail: pmw@williamson-krauss.com 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs James Albert Wells and 10 Judy Wells, and as the personal representatives of James Wells, deceased 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 24 26 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above entitled In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), the parties stipulate 25 action, by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 27 that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Matthew Erickson, only. 28 /////////// S t ip u la t io n re: Dismissal of Party & Order E .D . Cal. Case No. 1:08-CV-O1 l46-OWW-GSA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES ALBERT WELLS AND JUDY WELLS, Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-cv-1146 OWW GSA STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT MATTHEW ERICKSON; ORDER Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) -1- 1 In consideration for this dismissal, defendant, Matthew Erickson, agrees to appear 2 voluntarily, without the need to serve him with a subpoena, as a witness at trial in the 3 event this case proceeds to trial. 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S t ip u la t io n re: Dismissal of Party & Order E .D . Cal. Case No. 1:08-CV-O1 l46-OWW-GSA Each side shall bear its own costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. PORTER / SCOTT 6 DATED: June 3, 2010 By: /s/ TERENCE J. CASSIDY TERRENCE J. CASSIDY Attorney for Defendants DATED: June 3, 2010 WILLIAMSON & KRAUSS By: /s/ PETER M. WILLIAMSON PETER M. WILLIAMSON Attorney for Plaintiffs -2- 1 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S t ip u la t io n re: Dismissal of Party & Order E .D . Cal. Case No. 1:08-CV-O1 l46-OWW-GSA ORDER Defendant, Matthew Erickson, only, is dismissed from the instant action with 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 5 prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 3, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 Dated: -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?