Johnson v. Ortiz

Filing 82

ORDER signed by District Judge David C. Bury on 7/22/2011 denying as moot 53 , 70 Motions for Extension of time and denying 71 Motion for Expert Witness Cardiologist. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

Arthur Lee Johnson,

9

Plaintiff,
vs.

10
E. Doehring, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CV-1-08-1183-DCB P
ORDER

13
14

Plaintiff filed an Ex Parte Motion to Amend Fourth Amended Complaint. This is a

15

substantive motion that the Defendants will be allowed to respond to. There is no reason to

16

not inform the Defendants of the contents of this motion.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS ORDERED that the Motions for Extension of Time (Docs. 53, 70) are denied
as moot. Plaintiff has filed his responses to the pending motions for summary judgment.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Expert Witness Cardiologist (Doc. 71)
is denied without prejudice at this time.
DATED this 22nd day of July, 2011.