Dorian Davis v. Flores et al
Filing
79
ORDER Requiring Further Briefing (Docket No. 48 , 77 ), signed by District Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 7/17/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
JM
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
12
13
Case No.: 1:08-CV-1197 JTM (JMA)
DORIAN DAVIS aka WALI AL-TAQUI,
CDC #k-78041,
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER
BRIEFING
Plaintiff,
vs.
Docket No. 48, 77
14
15
16
17
E.G. FLORES, et al.,
Defendants.
On January 18, 2011, this court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to
18
all remaining claims and parties. Plaintiff appealed. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the prior
19
dismissal of Plaintiff’s Equal Protection Claim and the grant of summary judgment on Plaintiff’s
20
First Amendment and RLUIPA claims premised on the temporary suspension of in-cell use of
21
prayer oil. However, it vacated and remanded for further proceedings as to Plaintiff’s First
22
Amendment and RLUIPA claims premised on a prison prohibition of unsupervised inmate-led
23
religious services.
24
Defendants did not address Plaintiff’s First Amendment and RLUIPA claims based on
25
the prohibition of unsupervised inmate-led religious services. For that reason, Defendants will
1
1
be provided with an opportunity to supplement their motion for summary judgment with
2
additional briefing.
3
If Defendants wish to move for summary judgment on the grounds discussed above, they
4
shall file a supplemental brief of no more than ten pages on or before August 24, 2012. If
5
Plaintiff wishes to oppose Defendants’ motion, he shall submit an opposition brief of no more
6
than ten pages on or before October 5, 2012. Upon receipt of each party’s brief, the court will
7
take the matter under submission
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
DATED: July 17, 2012
______________________________
Jeffrey T. Miller
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?