S.A. v. Tulare County Office of Education et al

Filing 90

JUDGMENT dated *10/16/2009* signed by United States District Court Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. CASE CLOSED. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 action; 2. Judgment is entered in favor of California DOE and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff's section cause of action; 1 / On August 15, 2008, Plaintiff S.A. ("Plaintiff") initiated this action against Defendants Tulare County Office of Education ("TCOE") and California Department of Education ("DOE"), asserting violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment on August 19, 2009. For the reasons described in this Court's September 24, 2009 Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, and this Court's October 6, 2009 Order on Summary Judgment of Student's First Cause of Action, THIS COURT ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of TCOE and against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's first cause of TULARE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JUDGMENT S.A. a minor by and through her parents, and guardian ad litem, L.A. and M.A. CASE NO. CV F 08-1215 LJO GSA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 66h44d 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against TCOE, in part, on Plaintiff's third cause of action; 4. Plaintiff is awarded the amount of $2,791.27 in attorneys' fees and costs for his partiallysuccessful compliance complaint against TCOE, to be paid by TCOE; and 5. Plaintiff's rights to file an application for costs and a motion for attorneys fees are preserved under the applicable federal and local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 14, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?