Toth v. Yates et al

Filing 84

ORDER Amending Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations 73 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/26/2010. (Verduzco, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 J. DOE, 9 10 v. (Doc. 73) 11 YATES, et al., 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff J. Doe1 ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action Defendants. / Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01219-LJO-DLB PC ORDER AMENDING ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's second amended 17 complaint against Defendants J. D. Bennett, S. Gonzales, J. Melendez, Griffin, W. Brumbaugh, 18 H. Martinez, S. Kern, B. Diaz, P. Soares, E. Wolford, D. J. Hatten, N. Green, D. Huckabay, Cate, 19 John Doe 2, and John Doe 3. A review of the record indicates that Plaintiff also stated a 20 cognizable retaliation claim against Defendant lieutenant Smith, who was unintentionally 21 omitted. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action also proceed against 22 Defendant lieutenant Smith for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. 23 24 Dated: b9ed48 25 26 27 28
1

IT IS SO ORDERED. March 26, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Fictitious name.

1