De Puente-Hudson v. Adams
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING 7 Motion as MOOT, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/23/2009. (Sondheim, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij On October 17, 2008, Plaintiff Marco De Puente-Hudson filed a motion seeking an order setting forth any pending deadlines. In a separate order issued concurrently with this order, the Court directed Plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed against Defendant Adams on his cognizable First Amendment claim. Plaintiff has a thirtyday deadline pursuant to that screening order. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for notification of any pending deadlines is moot in light of the issuance of the screening order and is HEREBY DENIED on that ground. v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al., Defendants. / MARCO DE PUENTE-HUDSON, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01228-OWW-GSA PC ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT (Doc. 7)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
January 23, 2009
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
