Miller v. Rufion, et al
Filing
158
ORDER Requesting Confidential Settlement Statements Re: Case Selection for Prisoner Settlement Program, signed by Judge Barry T. Moskowitz on 8/11/2011. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
GERALD L. MILLER, JR.,
13
CASE NO. 08cv1233 BTM(WMc)
Plaintiff,
Order Requesting Confidential
Settlement Statements Re: Case
Selection for Prisoner Settlement
Program
v.
14
15
O. RUFINO, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
For purposes of assessing whether this case should be referred for an in-person settlement
18
proceeding, the parties to this action must, within ten (10) days from the date of the filing of this
19
Order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements shall not be
20
21
22
23
24
served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead, delivered by mail to the address
below, or via email to Rosa_Morales@cacd.uscourts.gov, and marked “Confidential.” Such
statements shall be limited to five (5) pages and shall
indicate the following:
1)
the party’s assessment of whether the instant action is of the type that would benefit
from an in-person settlement proceeding with a magistrate judge;
2)
the party’s assessment of when a settlement proceeding would be most productive
in this matter; and
3)
the party’s assessment of what factors, if any, will prevent settlement of this matter
prior to trial.
25
26
27
28
-1-
Case No. 08cv1233 BTM(WMc)
1
2
Should the Court determine this action to be appropriate for referral for an in-person settlement
3
conference, the Court will issue an appropriate order.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 11, 2011
6
7
Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz
United States District Judge
8
9
cc:
10
11
Rosa Morales
ADR Prisoner Settlement Coordinator
United States District Court
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case No. 08cv1233 BTM(WMc)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?