Davis v. Lynn et al

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request for Extension of Time to File Opposition to 16 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Reissuing Motion Hearing Date signed by Judge Barry T. Moskowitz on 7/27/2009. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for Friday, October 9, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 15. Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion due by 9/25/2009. Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition due by 10/2/2009. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Fresno Division ANTHONY DAVIS CDCR #T-48683, Plaintiff, vs. A. LYNN, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 1:08cv1245 BTM (BLM) HEARING DATE ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND REISSUING MOTION Currently pending before this Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 16]. The Court issued a scheduling order requiring Plaintiff to file an Opposition by Friday, August 21, 2009 and setting the hearing date for September 4, 2009. Defendants have notified the Court that Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file his Opposition due to his impending transfer to another institution. Defendants do not oppose this request. See Defs.' Notice of Non Opposition at 1-2. Accordingly, the Court vacates the dates previously set and sets the following briefing schedule: 1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is calendared for hearing on Friday, October 9, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 15. 2) Plaintiff, if he chooses, may file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion and serve it upon Defendants' counsel of record no later than Friday, September 25, 2009. -1E.D. California 1:08cv1245 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3) Defendants may file a Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition, and serve it upon Plaintiff no later than Friday, October 2, 2009. At the time appointed for hearing, the Court will consider Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6) as submitted on the papers, and will issue its written opinion soon thereafter. Thus, no appearances are required and no oral argument will be heard. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 27, 2009 Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge -2- E.D. California 1:08cv1245

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?