Haworth v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 11

ORDER DISCHARGING 9 Order to Show Cause; ORDER extending time for service, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 02/04/2009. (Service due by 3/2/2009)(Martin, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SHELLEY HAWORTH, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 On August 27, 2008, Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis, filed the present action for 17 judicial review of the denial of Social Security benefits. 18 On January 9, 2009, the Court issued an order to show cause based on Plaintiff's failure 19 to return the service documents. 20 Plaintiff's attorney filed a response on January 30, 2009, explaining that the oversight 21 was due to "considerable negligence or intentional harm" committed by a former employee. 22 Response, at 1. The law firm has attempted to correct these issues, but was not aware of the 23 24 Accordingly, for good cause shown, the January 9, 2009, order to show cause is 25 DISCHARGED. 26 27 28 Plaintiff also states that the order to show cause and "other actions" were sealed. However, review of the d o c k e t in 08cv1276 does not reveal any sealed documents. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08cv1276 DLB ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Document 9) ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, deficiency in this case.1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to either submit her USM-285 forms OR serve Defendant directly. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a February 4, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?