Uribe v. McKesson et al

Filing 36

ORDER REQUIRING Defendants to File an Opposition to 34 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 1/27/2010. Defendants' Opposition to Motion due by 2/12/2010. (Jessen, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CESAR URIBE, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 25, 2010 Plaintiff filed a second motion to compel discovery. Because the court will not hold oral argument and will take the matter under submission, it will not set a hearing date and time. The court, however, requires the Defendants to file an opposition to the motion no later than February 12, 2010. At that point the court will take the matter under submission, and no reply brief will be allowed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 27, 2010 Hon. Nita L. Stormes U.S. Magistrate Judge ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. ) McKESSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ) MARTINEZ, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ) ZARAGOSA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ) TUZON, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) Case No. 08cv1285 DMS (NLS) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

08cv1285 DMS (NLS)