McGlothin, et al v. Santos, et al.
ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' 10 Motion For an Extension of Time to File Objections to The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/13/2009. Objections to F&R due by 2/17/2009. (Esteves, C)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 MARIO SANTOS, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff McGlothin and Plaintiff Sconiers ("Plaintiffs") are proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis alleging inter alia, civil rights violations and violations of various housing laws. 20 On December 8, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations concerning 21 dismissal of Plaintiffs' complaint. On January 8, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a motion for an extension 22 of time within which to file objections to this court's findings and recommendations. 23 Both Plaintiffs have established good cause for the extension of time request. 24 Accordingly, the request is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file any objections no later than 25 thirty(30) days from the date of this order. 26 27 28 1 TIYEONDREA MCGLOTHIN, ABSALOM MASON, ZEPHYARIAH MASON; MALIA MASAON by next of friend TIYEONDREA MCGLOTHIN; and JANETTA SCONIERS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08cv1290 LJO GSA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Document 10)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiffs are advised that the court will not delay the progress of this action indefinitely pending the filing of objections. Failure to file timely objections will be considered a failure to comply with an order of the court and may result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij
January 13, 2009
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?