Cramer v. Schwarzenegger
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/24/2009 DISMISSING action with prejudice for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 6i0kij 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Plaintiff Matthew B. Cramer is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on June 16, 2008. On March 3, 2009, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted, and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), this action is HEREBY DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, (Docs. 1 and 11) Defendant. / MATTHEW B. CRAMER, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01310-GSA PC ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE ANY CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
April 24, 2009
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?