United States of America v. Vacante et al
Filing
92
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 88 Defendant's Motion to Oppose Extended Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/16/2009. (Jessen, A)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 On August 11, 2009, Plaintiff United States of America ("Plaintiff") filed a motion to extend discovery. The matter was heard on September 4, 2009, before the Honorable Dennis L. Beck, United States Magistrate Judge. Adair F. Boroughs appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Defendant Frank A. Vacante appeared telephonically. No oppositions to the motion were filed. At the hearing, Plaintiff and Defendant Frank Vacante informed the Court that they had reached an agreement to extend discovery to November 6, 2009. Plaintiff's counsel also indicated to the Court that additional dates in the Scheduling Order may need to be modified. On September 8, 2009, Plaintiff's counsel submitted a proposed order to grant the motion to extend discovery and to modify the scheduling order, which was signed by the Court. On that same date, Defendant Frank Vacante filed a document entitled "Motion to Oppose Extended Defendants. v. FRANK A. VACANTE, et al., Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08cv1349 OWW DLB ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO OPPOSE EXTENDED DISCOVERY AS MOOT (Document 88)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Discovery." The document appears to be an untimely opposition to Plaintiff's motion to extend discovery. Based on the parties' agreement at the hearing to extend discovery, Defendant's Motion to Oppose Extended Discovery is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a
September 16, 2009
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?