Garafolo v. Carrasco, et al.

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING 1 Complaint for Failure to Comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ;and Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED signed by District Judge G. Murray Snow on 2/18/2009. If Plaint iff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice. ( Amended Complaint due by 3/23/2009) (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint)(Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 JD D L KM I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Vanjilis Garafolo, Plaintiff, vs. M . Carrasco, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) N o . CV 1-08-1371-GMS ORDER P la in tif f Vanjilis Garafolo, who is confined in the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, California, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. #1). This case was reassigned to the undersigned judge on November 24, 2008. T h e Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints T h e Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised c la im s that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may b e granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 2 8 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the a lle g a tio n of other facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JD D L b e f o re dismissal of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (e n banc). The Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type o f advice "would undermine district judges' role as impartial decisionmakers." Pliler v. F o r d , 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide w h e th e r the court was required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). Plaintiff's Complaint w i ll be dismissed with leave to amend because the Complaint may possibly be saved by a m e n d m e n t. R u le 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a "short and plain statement o f the claim." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Rule 8(d)(1) states that "[e]ach allegation must be s im p le , concise, and direct." A complaint having the factual elements of a cause of action s c a tte re d throughout the complaint and not organized into a "short and plain statement of the claim " may be dismissed for failure to satisfy Rule 8(a). See Sparling v. Hoffman Constr. C o ., 864 F.2d 635, 640 (9th Cir. 1988); see also McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 1 9 9 6 ). Rule 10(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure also requires a plaintiff to state c la im s in "numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of c irc u m s ta n c es ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b). Moreover, "[i]f doing so would promote clarity, each c la im founded on a separate transaction or occurrence . . . must be stated in a separate count." F e d . R. Civ. P. 10(b). It is not the responsibility of the Court to review a rambling narrative in an attempt to determine the number and nature of a plaintiff's claims. A lth o u g h Plaintiff has used a court-supplied form, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's C o m p la in t and concludes that it fails to comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of C ivil Procedure. Plaintiff's Complaint is nothing more than a lengthy narrative. The Court ca n n o t meaningfully review the Complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). A c c o rd in g ly, the Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. II. L e a v e to Amend F o r the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Complaint will be dismissed for failure to c o m p l y with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Within 30 days, -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JD D L P l a in tif f may submit a first amended complaint on the form provided with this Order. If P la in tif f fails to use the form provided with this Order, the Court may strike the amended c o m p l a in t and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. P la in t if f must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the "First A m e n d e d Complaint." The amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety o n the form provided with this Order and may not incorporate any part of the original C o m p la in t by reference. P lain tiff must comply with the instructions provided with the form. Plaintiff should p a y close attention to the instructions provided with the form. If Plaintiff fails to comply w ith the instructions provided with the form, the Court may strike the amended complaint a n d dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. Among other requirements contained in the instructions, Plaintiff must provide in f o r m a tio n in an amended complaint regarding the Court's jurisdiction and the defendants, a n d he must divide his lawsuit into separate counts. In each count, Plaintiff must identify th e federal constitutional civil right 1 allegedly violated, check the box for the issue most c lo s e ly involved, state how each defendant participated in the alleged violation at issue, e x p la in how Plaintiff was injured by the alleged violation, and mark whether Plaintiff e x h a u ste d any available administrative remedies. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each c iv il rights claim. Plaintiff may allege only one claim per count. T o establish that he was denied meaningful access to the courts, a plaintiff must s u b m it evidence showing that he suffered an "actual injury" as a result of the defendants' a c ti o n s . See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996). An "actual injury" is "actual prejudice w ith respect to contemplated or existing litigation, such as the inability to meet a filing d e a d lin e or to present a claim." Id. at 348. To show actual injury with respect to c o n tem p late d litigation, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the conduct of the defendants p re v e n te d him from bringing to court a nonfrivolous claim that he wished to present. Id. at 3 5 2 - 5 3 . That nonfrivolous claim must be a direct or collateral attack on the inmate's s e n te n c e, or a challenge to the conditions of his confinement. Id. at 355. "Impairment of any o th e r litigating capacity is simply one of the incidental (and perfectly constitutional) co n seq u en ce s of conviction and incarceration." Id. (emphasis in original). -3- 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JD D L A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F .2 d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1 5 4 6 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as n o n e x is te n t. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original c o m p l a in t is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 5 6 5 , 567 (9th Cir. 1987). III. M o tio n for Appointment of Counsel O n December 19, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. There is no constitutional right to appointment of counsel in a civil case. See Ivey v. Board of R e g e n ts of University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266 (9th Cir. 1982). The appointment of counsel in a civil rights case is required only when exceptional circumstances are present. Aldabe v . Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1980); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1 9 8 6 ). "A finding of exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both `the lik e lih o o d of success on the merits [and] the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims p r o se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.'" Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331 (q u o tin g Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983)). The Court must review both o f these factors together in deciding whether or not to appoint counsel. Id. The Court has reviewed and evaluated the Complaint and finds this action presents n o "exceptional circumstances" requiring the appointment of counsel at this time. Plaintiff is in no different a position than other pro se litigations who have brought nearly identical c la im s . Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #10) will be d e n ie d . IV. W a r n in g s A. A d d r e s s Changes P lain tiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 8 3 -1 8 2 (f ) and 83-183(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in d is m is s a l of this action. -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JD D L B. Copies P la in tif f must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See L R C iv 5-133(d)(2). Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further n o tic e to Plaintiff. C. Possible Dismissal I f Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these w a rn in g s , the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1 2 6 0 -6 1 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the C o u r t) . IT IS ORDERED: (1) T h e Complaint (Doc. #1) is dismissed for failure to comply with Rules 8 and 1 0 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended complaint in compliance with this Order. (2 ) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of C o u rt must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with p r e ju d ic e . (3 ) is denied. (4 ) T h e Clerk of Court must include with this Order a copy of this judge's required P la in tif f 's December 19, 2008 Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #10) fo rm for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. D A T E D this 18 th day of February, 2009. -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?