Garafolo v. Carrasco, et al.

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by District Judge G. Murray Snow on 4/1/2009. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. M . Carrasco, et al., Defendants. Vanjlis Garafolo, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) N o . CV 1-08-1371-GMS ORDER I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KM

In a February 18, 2009 Order (Doc. #11), the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint fo r failure to comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court g a v e Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in th e Order and warned Plaintiff as follows: If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the C le rk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of d is m is s a l of this action with prejudice. M o re than 30 days have passed since the Court's February 18, 2009 Order was filed. P la in tif f has not filed an amended complaint. In accordance with the Court's February 18, 2 0 0 9 Order, the Court will require the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment of dismissal of this c a s e , with prejudice, for failure to comply with a Court order. Accordingly, /// /// /// ///

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I T IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this c a se , with prejudice, for failure to comply with a Court order. D A T E D this 1st day of April, 2009.

-2-